A French court convicted this tanker of one false flag. The record shows three.

On 2 July 2026 a French court fined the owner of the tanker Tagor one million euros. The vessel had been intercepted by the French Navy in the North Atlantic in late May, en route from Murmansk to Cameroon. It pleaded guilty to sailing under a false flag and to refusing to obey orders. The owner paid, undertook to obtain a legitimate flag registration before the ship returned to service, and the Tagor was released. It sailed for Istanbul.

The court ruled on one false flag. The registry record shows three.

Three flags in nine months

The vessel's flag history, as recorded by IHS Maritime and published through Equasis, reads as follows for the period since August 2025:

Each of the last three carries the annotation False — the record does not confirm the state named as the flag of registry. The Cameroon entry is the one the French court ruled on. It was the third in the sequence, not an isolated lapse, and the pattern sat in a public database before the interception.

For a compliance officer that is the practical point. A flag check returning "Cameroon" and stopping there gives a true answer to the wrong question. The record itself carried the qualifier.

The identifiers do not agree either

The vessel is designated by five authorities, and separately identified by a sixth:

The American listing is worth pausing on. It sits under the Iran sanctions programme, not the Russia one — yet the voyage France interdicted ran from Murmansk. One hull, designated under an Iran programme, carrying Russian crude.

Then there is the number the ship actually transmits. The sanctions record carries MMSI 352002249. The first three digits are the Maritime Identification Digits, which encode the flag state: 352 is Panama, matching the flag it wore until 2025. But the vessel now broadcasts MMSI 613442790, and 613 is Cameroon.

So a screening system keyed on MMSI, checked against the sanctions record, does not match the ship on the water. The sanctions entry also still lists its flag as Panama. Two public records, both correct when written, now describing a vessel that has moved on from both.

Only one identifier survives all of it. The IMO number — 9282481 — has been constant since it was built in 2005 as a 114,809-tonne crude tanker, through four names, seven flags and eleven managers. That is the entire argument for anchoring on it.

Twenty years, four names, and a long way down

The same record holds the vessel's history. Read in order, it is the clearest illustration we have of what a shadow-fleet hull is: not a category of ship, but a destination a ship arrives at.

It began as a BP tanker on the Isle of Man register, classed by Lloyd's Register and managed by BP Shipping. In 2018 it passed to Anglo-Eastern, a mainstream third-party manager, under the Marshall Islands flag. In December 2022 the commercial manager of record became Fractal Marine DMCC, a UAE company since sanctioned by the United Kingdom. In June 2024 it became Algae Ship Charter FZCO, designated by both the United States and the United Kingdom. From December 2024 the commercial manager has been Zulu Ships Management, with Tarabya Logistics Ltd as ISM manager.

The day the paperwork went dark

Then three things happened at once. The record dates all of them to 30 July 2025 — the same day the United States designated the vessel.

The ISM manager is the company legally answerable for a ship's safe operation. On the day the designation landed, that entry stopped naming anyone, the ownership moved to the manager, and the classification society ended a relationship that had run since 2005. The safety management certificate had already been withdrawn in December 2024.

A year later the vessel was still trading, and the record still names no ISM manager.

What a port state found

The paperwork is one half. Inspectors are the other.

In December 2023 the Tagor was detained for eleven days at Kalilimenes, Greece, under a Paris MoU expanded inspection, with twenty deficiencies. The grounds for detention were not administrative. They included the propulsion main engine and auxiliary engines recorded as not as required, fire detection and fire-protection maintenance not as required, fire-fighting equipment inoperative, emergency lighting inoperative, lifeboats not properly maintained, and fire and abandon-ship drills recorded as lacking control.

That detention fell during the Fractal Marine period. It is worth setting against the inspection record from earlier in the vessel's life: a decade of routine port state control calls in Australia, the United States, Spain and Italy, passing without detention.

The geography of those inspections tells its own story. Through 2018 they cluster in Fremantle, Kwinana, Brisbane, Long Beach and Portland, Maine. From 2019 they are Vostochny and Taman — Russian Pacific and Black Sea. The most recent on record is Vostochny, July 2025.

It was already dark when the navy found it

The documentary record is one half. The vessel's own transmissions are the other, and for this voyage the two can be laid directly against each other.

It was broadcasting from the Kola Bay, off Murmansk, at the start of May. It worked its way north-east into the Barents Sea, then turned west. On 25 May it stopped transmitting in the Norwegian Sea, at 68.9°N 10.7°E.

The French Navy seized it six days later, on 31 May, roughly 400 nautical miles west of the tip of Brittany — a joint operation with the United Kingdom conducted under Article 110 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the right of visit used to verify a vessel's nationality. The boarding team examined the ship's papers and confirmed the flag was irregular. A report went to the public prosecutor in Brest, and the tanker was escorted to an anchorage.

It transmitted again on 2 June, the day it arrived in Douarnenez Bay — 1,329 nautical miles from where it had gone quiet. The great-circle distance between those two points is about 1,334 miles. The silence covers the interception and the passage under escort.

The sequence is the finding. The transponder went quiet on 25 May; the interception was on 31 May. The vessel was not silenced by the boarding — it was already dark when the navy found it, and had been for six days, while under way in the North Atlantic.

One honest limit: satellite AIS coverage is not continuous, so a gap of this length cannot be proved deliberate from our data alone. What can be stated is that the vessel stopped transmitting six days before it was intercepted, that it was under way rather than stationary throughout, and that the boarding found it flying a flag its registry does not confirm. The guilty plea covered refusing to obey orders as well as the false flag.

It then lay in Douarnenez Bay, transmitting almost nothing, until the court ruled on 2 July.

Where it is now

After release it ran south — past Portugal, through the Strait of Gibraltar, across the Mediterranean. On 24 July it arrived off Port Said, at the Mediterranean mouth of the Suez Canal, and stopped.

It has not moved since. Our data runs to 30 July and it is still there, holding position to within a tenth of a nautical mile, having gone dark twice while stationary — fifteen hours, then forty-one.

On release it was reported bound for Istanbul. Port Said is not on the way to Istanbul. It is, however, one of the world's larger bunkering anchorages, so there are ordinary reasons to stop there. We are not claiming a diversion. We are recording that a vessel released on an undertaking about its flag has spent a week stationary at a canal entrance, dark for stretches, and has not gone where it said it was going.

The companies that connect two case files

Algae Ship Charter FZCO is not only Tagor's former commercial manager. It also appears in the ownership chain of the Eventin, the tanker Germany seized off Rügen and is now pursuing through its Federal Fiscal Court — the subject of our previous reconstruction. Fractal Marine DMCC and Wanta Shipping appear in both records too.

Two vessels, two jurisdictions, two separate enforcement actions, and three shared companies behind them. That link is visible only if you read the dated management history rather than the current registration.

What to watch next

The Tagor's owner told a French court it would obtain a legitimate flag registration before returning the ship to service. That is a specific, dated, checkable undertaking.

Our capture of the registry record is dated 22 July 2026, three weeks after the release. At that point the flag of record was still Cameroon, still annotated false. Three weeks is short — registry data lags, and a legitimate reflag may simply not have reached the record yet. We are not asserting the undertaking was broken. We are noting that it is testable, and that the answer will appear in the same public field this article has been reading throughout.

That is the method in one sentence: a vessel's current registration is a claim, and its history is the check on that claim.

Method

This piece rests on the vessel's registry and inspection record as published through Equasis, sourced to IHS Maritime and to the port state control regimes named, captured 22 July 2026 and anchored to IMO 9282481 — the identifier that survives every name and flag change above. Positions are from satellite and terrestrial AIS covering 1 May to 30 July 2026. Gaps are reported only where a prior transmission establishes a real onset: the earliest gap in any dataset begins at the edge of the data itself and cannot be distinguished from the start of collection, so it is excluded rather than counted. Distances between a last-seen and a first-seen position are straight-line measurements, not tracks. Designation dates are drawn from primary authority lists via OpenSanctions; Ukraine's War and Sanctions register is an advisory identification and is labelled as such throughout, never counted as a designation. MMSI country attribution uses the ITU Maritime Identification Digit table, not inference. The French court outcome is a matter of public record and is cited to contemporaneous reporting. Company roles and inspection findings are presented as recorded, dated facts.

We report what the record says. Whether it amounts to continued control by a designated party, and what that means for any transaction, is a determination for the reader's own counsel.

Use

This reconstruction is free to use, but you must credit AIS Dark.

The full case file is free too. It carries the complete dated management chain, the five-authority designation timeline, the detention grounds in full, the identifier divergence, and a per-claim evidence grade for every finding above — including what we did not assess. Enter an email below and we'll send it over.

Want the same reconstruction on a vessel you are looking at? Get in touch.

As of 30 July 2026. Case AISD-9282481.